{"id":11595,"date":"2012-01-18T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2015-03-22T16:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"-0001-11-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"-0001-11-30T04:00:00","slug":"ANEEL-5120","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/?p=11595","title":{"rendered":"Appeals against fines examined by ANEEL&#8221;s Board"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><b>Fonte: <\/b><a href='http:\/\/www.aneel.gov.br\/aplicacoes\/noticias\/Output_Noticias.cfm?Identidade=5120&#038;id_area=90'><b>ANEEL<\/b><\/a><\/p>\n<p>The Board of the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (ANEEL) has examined appeals by three companies against penalties applied and decided to keep the fines. The violations include technical irregularities noted during the technical and commercial inspection, as well as failures in the calculation of the DEC, FEC, DIC, FIC and DMIC continuity indices in the first half of 2010. The Board&rsquo;s decision ends the possibility of an appeal by the concessionaires at the administrative level. Below is the table below with details of the violations: (PG\/DB).<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<table align='center' border='5' cellpadding='0' cellspacing='1' style='width: 97%' width='622'>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style='text-align: center; width: 13%; white-space: nowrap; vertical-align: middle'>\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Company<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style='text-align: center; width: 26.64%'>\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Violation<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style='text-align: center; width: 22.68%'>\n\t\t\t\t<strong>Final fine amount<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style='text-align: center; width: 36.28%'>\n\t\t\t\t<strong>ANEEL&rsquo;s decision<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style='width: 13.66%; height: 46px'>\n\t\t\t\tEsp&iacute;rito Santo Centrais El&eacute;tricas S.A. &#8211; ESCELSA<\/td>\n<td style='width: 26.64%; height: 46px'>\n\t\t\t\tNoncompliance regarding the technical and commercial inspection held in 2010<\/td>\n<td style='text-align: center; width: 22.68%; height: 46px'>\n\t\t\t\tR$2,646,316.31<\/td>\n<td style='width: 36.28%; height: 46px'>\n\t\t\t\tThe agency decided to verify and, on the merit, give partial approval to the appeal filed by Esp&iacute;rito Santo Centrais El&eacute;tricas S.A. &ndash; ESCELSA. The fine applied by the Electricity Service Supervision Superintendence &ndash; SFE &ndash; was maintained.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style='width: 13.66%; height: 54px'>\n\t\t\t\tCentrais El&eacute;tricas de Rond&ocirc;nia S\/A &ndash; CERON<\/td>\n<td style='width: 26.64%; height: 54px'>\n\t\t\t\tFailures in the calculation of the DEC, FEC, DIC, FIC and DMIC continuity indices in the first half of 2010<\/td>\n<td style='text-align: center; width: 22.68%; height: 54px'>\n\t\t\t\tR$1, 688,685.06<\/td>\n<td style='width: 36.28%; height: 54px'>\n\t\t\t\tThe agency decided to verify and dismiss the appeal filed by Centrais El&eacute;tricas de Rond&ocirc;nia &#8211; CERON. The fine applied by the Electricity Service Supervision Superintendence &ndash; SFE &ndash; was maintained<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style='width: 13.66%; height: 70px'>\n\t\t\t\tCompanhia Estadual de Distribui&ccedil;&atilde;o de Energia El&eacute;trica &ndash; CEEE-D<\/td>\n<td style='width: 26.64%; height: 70px'>\n\t\t\t\tDelay in submitting information regarding service continuity and noncompliance with the DEC and FEC collective continuity indicator targets in2009.<\/td>\n<td style='text-align: center; width: 22.68%; height: 70px'>\n\t\t\t\tR$9,439,517.84<\/td>\n<td style='width: 36.28%; height: 70px'>\n\t\t\t\tThe agency decided to verify and give partial approval to the appeal filed by Companhia Estadual de Distribui&ccedil;&atilde;o de Energia El&eacute;trica &ndash; CEEE-D. The fine applied by the State Delegated Public Service Regulatory Agency&nbsp; &ndash; AGERGS&ndash; was maintained<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fonte: ANEEL The Board of the Brazilian Electricity Regulatory Agency (ANEEL) has examined appeals by three companies against penalties applied and decided to keep the fines. The violations include technical irregularities noted during the technical and commercial inspection, as well as failures in the calculation of the DEC, FEC, DIC, FIC and DMIC continuity indices [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11595"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=11595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11595\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=11595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=11595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/sindenergia.com.br\/seminario\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=11595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}